Le 06/01/16 16:44, Shawn McKinney a écrit : >> On Jan 6, 2016, at 9:23 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> AFAIR, when we had this conversation (probably 2 years ago), we talked >> about using an embedded ApacheDS server in the Fortress API, server that >> would be synced with the remote LDAP server. >> >> This is far from being a simple architecture... > Ah yes I remember now. In that scenario the runtime would always use the > cache, in this case embedded ldap server. Yep. And as you can have ApacheDS using a in-memory backend, you won't have any data stored on disk (but you might also have the data on disk, if for instance you are using an application on a laptop that is not likely to be connected to the network all the time).
> Worth considering down the road… Fortress 2.0 ?
