Le 15/02/16 20:30, Jan Sindberg a écrit : > We have seen the same, so lovely coined as "jar-hell", in many forums. We > almost choose to add the REST-server and talk with that to avoid the > dependencies. We never got to that, so I don't know if there is a thin > model available for REST? > If not, that could be a solution for some. > Moving the model into one module, wouldn't that still make you dependent of > real implementation and all the dependencies there is now - assuming you > would want to go with an API which connects directly to LDAP?
Two things (a bit general, and i'm not going to address the original question) : - first, it would be wise to think about making Fortress OSGi compliant. That would help a lot. - second, and probably more accurate : if we want to change anything, it has to be done before we cut a 1.0-GA. Considering the currently low number of users, it might be a good timing to chnage wht has to be change. Doing so later would really be a pain for everyone ! But I'm just expressing my own opinion.
