We are using OpenLDAP, but adding the lines into our code seems to have fixed a few infrequent timeout errors. I don't understand the intracacies of the connections and the pooling, but it is probably worth waiting until the ldap api updates to the newer version of commons pool before spending a lot of time diagnosing the problems.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shawn McKinney" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 9:26:17 AM Subject: Re: LDAP connection timeoutI > On Apr 7, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Jan Sindberg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Fra: Shawn McKinney [mailto:[email protected]] > ... >> Jan, one of the advantages to being a volunteer is not having to apologize. > > Thanks, but I do prefer to answer when I get addressed :-) And I really, > really wanted to do more that has been possible lately. OK > > On Apr 7, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Jan Sindberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am still very short om spare time, so I hope I can outsource completion of > this task to some of you. What I can deliver here is a patch of what we have > applied in our production which have run successfully since 9. Marts. Note > that this is based on an early RC41. > I can't deliver any automated test, it is either believe that it is a good > thing that we don't get any complaints from our customers, or try to > formalize what I have wrote earlier in this thread. Same here. Since Chris brought it up, mebbie he can find the time. > > On Apr 7, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Jan Sindberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think that I also wrote earlier that the patch is a qualified guess meaning > that the solution works satisfactorily for us, but that it might be possible > to tweak it a little more with more knowledge of for instance the real > timeout which ApacheDS uses for connections (iff that is not controlled by > some loadbalancer or elasticIp that our OP team has put in front, I don't > know). Maybe timeout should be configurable? But the what should be our > recommendation and advice on how to find optimum? Maybe it doesn't matter :-) > Two months since I started this thread, and it feels like very long time B-) > > The patch is attached. Did not see it. Prolly best to create a JIRA and attach it there. Thanks, Shawn
