Le 11/10/16 à 16:25, Shawn McKinney a écrit : >> On Oct 11, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Yes, to cover all the chars a password may content. But you may also >> make it so that the password only contains valid chars (ie, some that >> can be stored in a String without being invalid), avoiding this hex >> representation. > What’s going on here is we’ve uncovered a 2nd problem (pw values), > independent of the 1st (pw datatypes). The 2nd problem dictates we support > password values in an expanded character set encompassing anything that can > be carried in a String of 2 byte hex.
IMHO, you can safely ignore the concern (ie, bytes that can't be stred in a String). That will never happen.