Not sure I'm following. I created a PropertyMgr / PropertyDAO that can crud properties on objects that support ftProps (Role, AdminRole, PermObj, Permission). Should it handle Group? If so, how?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shawn McKinney" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 1:38:54 PM Subject: Re: Groups ftProps > On Nov 22, 2016, at 12:03 PM, Chris Pike <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ftProps should be allowed on groups correct? I don't see it being added as an > object class in the GroupDAO. The default uses this structural OC: ## OC8: LDAP Configuration Group Structural Object Class objectClass ( ftObId:8 NAME 'configGroup' DESC 'LDAP Configuration Group' SUP groupOfNames MUST ( configProtocol $ ftType ) MAY configParameter ) and maps the properties name/values to the configParameter attribute. But that default can be changed by altering these these fortress.properties settings: private static final String GROUP_OBJECT_CLASS = "group.objectclass"; private String GROUP_OBJECT_CLASS_IMPL; private static final String GROUP_PROTOCOL_ATTR = "group.protocol"; private String GROUP_PROTOCOL_ATTR_IMPL; private static final String GROUP_PROPERTY_ATTR = "group.properties”; The rationale is so that other types of groups can be used, for example Guacamole’s group objects can be managed by fortress although I don’t recall whether we supported props there as well. Thanks, Shawn
