> On Aug 24, 2018, at 10:57 AM, Shawn McKinney <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Aug 23, 2018, at 10:14 AM, Shawn McKinney <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Which will piggyback on the existing entity, repurposing some of its fields: >> String id; <— not used, left blank >> RCType type <- ‘USER' >> String value <- contains the attribute’s value >> String paSetName; <- contains the attribute’s (key) name > > speaking of attrs, propose we change these to : > value -> keyValue, paSetName -> keyName.
or perhaps more succintly: String key; <- paSetName String value; (, no change req’d —Shawn
