*** From [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tomasz Iwanowski)

Congress, ignoring Bush, strongly expresses support of
Israel

By Alison Mitchell 
NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE 

May 3, 2002 

WASHINGTON - The House and Senate voted overwhelmingly
yesterday in rapid succession to express strongly
worded support for Israel in its recent military
operations, largely brushing aside last-minute
attempts by the Bush administration to soften language
criticizing the Palestinians.

The two congressional resolutions were nonbinding, but
they put the legislative branch of government on
record as backing the military actions of Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon of Israel, even as President
Bush has called on Israel to end its "occupation" of
Palestinian towns.

The Senate voted 94-2 in favor of its resolution,
which also calls on the Palestinian Authority to act
against terrorism, as Bush has also done. The House
quickly followed, voting 352-21 in support of a
tougher-worded measure stating concern that the
actions of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat "are not
those of a viable partner for peace." Twenty-nine
House members voted "present" as a protest that the
resolution was too tilted toward Israel.

Reps. Randy Cunningham, R-Escondido; Duncan Hunter,
R-El Cajon; Darrell Issa, R-Vista; Bob Filner, D-San
Diego; and Susan Davis, D-San Diego, voted with the
majority.

Even after appeals to delay such resolutions, members
of Congress in both chambers and both parties rushed
to assert their solidarity with Israel, which has
strong support from two influential political
constituencies, Jewish Democrats and Christian
conservatives.

Their actions served to complicate the delicate
diplomacy Bush is trying to conduct to end the
violence and restart negotiations.

In emotional debate, House members and Senate members
from the left and right repeatedly branded Arafat a
"terrorist" and a "despot." A minority of lawmakers
expressed reservations about the policies of Sharon.

The Israeli prime minister arrives in Washington next
week for talks with Bush. Administration officials
have tried in recent weeks to urge him to withdraw his
forces from the West Bank and to moderate military
actions against Palestinians.

The congressional votes in effect endorsed Israel's
recent military campaign, aspects of which have drawn
strong criticism from human-rights groups. The
resolutions may make it more difficult for Bush to
counsel Sharon to exercise restraint.

King Adbullah II of Jordan is also scheduled to visit
Washington next week for talks with Bush and Secretary
of State Colin Powell. The White House has been trying
to enlist moderate Arab support for its diplomatic
efforts, which include talks with Arafat.

A minority of lawmakers called the measures
dangerously tilted toward Israel. "This resolution
blindly supports Israel's action against the
Palestinians and wholly denies the generations of
suffering of the Palestinian people," said Rep. David
Bonior, D-Mich., a state with a significant Arab
immigrant population.

Sens. Ernest F. Hollings, D-S.C., and Robert C. Byrd,
D-W.Va., were the only senators who voted against the
resolution. Hollings, in debate, suggested many of his
colleagues were after campaign contributions.

But the overwhelming vote was for support of Israel.
It included a number of House Republican leaders and
conservatives who showed little patience for calls for
a middle ground in the Middle East, pointing to
growing tensions between Bush and his conservative
base.

On the eve of the vote, House Majority Leader Dick
Armey of Texas endorsed a position flatly at odds with
the long-standing precepts of the Oslo peace effort.
"I'm content to have Israel grab the entire West Bank,
he said in an appearance on "Hardball With Chris
Matthews" on MSNBC. He added under questioning, "I
happen to believe that the Palestinians should leave."

Yesterday, House Majority Whip Tom DeLay added his
support.

"Let every terrorist know: The American people will
never abandon freedom, democracy or Israel," DeLay
said. "America will never permit the state of Israel
to fall to aggression."

Democrats were equally impassioned.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., who is considered a
possible challenger to Bush in 2004, read aloud Bush's
uncompromising words in the days after Sept. 11 that
nations would have to choose between standing with the
United States or with terrorists.

"The intention of this statement is really to embody
and express those last words that I quoted from
President Bush," said Lieberman, the sponsor of the
Senate measure along with Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore.

While the House and Senate resolutions yesterday
differed in tone, both said the United States and
Israel are in a "common struggle against terrorism"
and both expressed solidarity with Israel "as it takes
necessary steps to provide security to its people by
dismantling the terrorist infrastructure in the
Palestinian areas." The White House tried and failed
to have that clause removed, said congressional aides.

FASCISM IMBUED, a comment:

With a plain disrespect paid to the wordl's opinion
and historical facts (even written in the Holy Bible),
a bunch of Cogressmen did express their solidarity
with Israel giving a green light for its further
murderous acts. They did so with an euphoric state of
mind believing in the military might of the U.S. A
might on which fascists and communists relied upon
trying to impose their will onto others -
for in power lies a strenght of argumentation. And
they did not take into account that the might has been
created by the people of the US. But they did not ask
the people for their opinion. They do not even want to
know, that Palestinians are not agressors. Their land
was taken away twice with force by Israeli hordes.
First time 3250 years ago by Moses, and 57 years ago
by murderers Menachem Begin and Ariel Sharon. The
Congressmen also did not care about Oslo Accords of
1993. With their most recent resolution they sponsored
Moses' tyranny and his conquest of Palestine with the
help of such suicide terrorists like Samson of the
Book of Judges 16:30.   

The Oslo Accords
 
The Oslo accords are the foundation on which peace
negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians are
based. 

Officially called the "Declaration of Principles," the
accords were negotiated secretly by Israeli and
Palestinian delegations in 1993 in Oslo, Norway,
guided by Norwegian Foreign Minister Johan Jorgen
Holst. 

It was signed in a historic Washington ceremony hosted
by President Bill Clinton on September 13, 1993,
during which PLO chairman Yasser Arafat and Israeli
Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin grasped hands in an
uneasy, yet unforgettable handshake. 

The declaration is the first phase in the ongoing
peace process; it lays out the goals to be achieved.
Those goals are the complete withdrawal of Israeli
troops from the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, and the
Palestinians' right to self- rule in those
territories. 

As of October 1996, Israeli troops had withdrawn from
all territory except for the West Bank city of Hebron.
The Palestinians had elected a parliament and Arafat
as their first president, and established their own
police force. 

Accompanying the agreement were the "Letters of Mutual
Recognition." In signing those letters, Israel
officially recognized for the first time the Palestine
Liberation Organization as the legitimate
representative of the Palestinian people. 

And for the first time, the PLO recognized Israel's
right to exist, renounced terrorism, rescinded its
call for Israel's destruction and accepted the
principle of land for peace. 
 
So, it can be said, that Hennecke Kardel with his book
Adolf Hitler Founder of Israel available at
(www.amazon.com> or at 1-800-5192465 was and still is
right. Read it!
  

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com


===============================================================
Lista 'Forum Zagraniczne'          Administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archiwum: http://www.mail-archive.com/forum.zagraniczne@3w3.net

Odpowiedź listem elektroniczym