Kate Rhodes wrote:
makes sense to me. I can totally see the benefit of both approaches.
Not that I have any say in any of this but, from what Frank's described I
think this could be a nice addition to SWIXML.
-Kate
Thanks Kate :)
I might add this is not a "implement this" wish, it is already done. If
people want to use it or not is'nt that important. Important is, they
are *able* to use it. I do find it useful, maybe others too. And I do
not want to get rid of the "public Action" approach -- it is suitable
for several problems, sure.
By the way, IMHO the avalon framework stated something like "Separation
of Concerns" (see
http://avalon.apache.org/framework/guide-patterns-soc.html). This is
exactly what I intend.
