Dear Forum, Dear Joe,

I first have to amend the explanation of what the routines I mentioned do: If H is not normal in G, it is not guaranteed that this approach (or any other approach that computes subgroups inductively) will find all classes of H, when working up to G-conjugacy.

The reason is that two subgroups U,V of H might be conjugate in G, but not in H, and one has subgroups or supergroups in H and the other not (it has these subgroups in G, but they don't lie in H).

For example take G=S6 and H=<(1,2,3,4),(1,3)(56)> (isomorphic to D8) and U=<(1,3)(2,4)>, V=<(1,3)(5,6)>. Then U is conjugate to V in G, but there is a subgroup of H, namely <(1,2,3,4)> which contains U, but V is not contained in any such subgroup of H. One can build similar examples for subgroups.

I cannot see how to avoid this problem for any kind of algorithm -- this means one cannot discard G-conjugate subgroups early, but might need to extend/process them later, even if they themselves are G- conjugate.

Best,

    Alexander

On Oct 9, 2008, at 2:14 PM, Joe Bohanon wrote:

This seems like it will get the job done, however it appears to be dependent on being able to at least find zuppos of G. For instance, say G is the Suzuki sporadic group and H is its smallest maximal subgroup (an A7). The filter doesn't apply to the zuppos, and for that group, I can imagine it would take a very long time to get all of them. Is there anything that would get lost by computing zuppos of A7 then collapsing under conjugacy in Suz?

I'm specifically asking because sometimes the maximal subgroups of some simple groups have enormous rank elementary abelian subgroups with tons of subgroups that aren't conjugate in H but end up being conjugate in G. I'm just trying to save some time by testing for conjugacy in G on the front end. I had one group that was extending class 5,000 to get class 10,000, and would probably have gobbled up all memory if I'd let it.

Thanks
Joe

_______________________________________________
Forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gap-system.org/mailman/listinfo/forum

Reply via email to