Dear Igor,
Could you try starting GAP with the -D option (and without -A and -r).
This will produce a lot of messages. Could you send us the 10 or so either side
of the error message, please?
Steve
On 5 Apr 2011, at 14:46, Alexander Konovalov wrote:
> Dear Igor,
>
> Thank you very much for notifying us about the intended package, and you are
> very
> welcome to present it for a wider audience.
>
> To decide what to do next when your package will be available, please see the
> page
> Submitting Contributions to GAP:
> http://www.gap-system.org/Contacts/submit.html
>
> Quoting that page, there are two options listed there:
>
> ***
>
> 1) Submitting Material for Formal Refereeing
>
> The author of a contribution that is intended for formal acceptance should
> begin the process by notifying the Chair of the GAP Council by emailing
> coun...@gap-system.org, providing full information where the complete
> material has been placed.
>
> 2) Submitting Deposited Contributions
>
> You are also invited to provide material that is not intended for formal
> refereeing. To tell us about such material, contact supp...@gap-system.org.
> (Packages can also be put into this category while refereeing is in process.)
>
> ***
>
> It is up to package authors to decide between these two options, and
> certainly it's possible to start with (2) and then decide to submit as in (1)
> at some stage later, or to submit the package for the refereeing as in (1)
> with or without depositing it simultaneously as in (2).
>
> Best wishes,
> Alexander
>
>
> On 5 Apr 2011, at 13:01, Igor Korepanov wrote:
>
>> Dear Alexander,
>>
>> Thank you for the prompt reaction to my message,
>>
>> and indeed, when I started GAP with
>>
>> gap -r -A -l ";/home/myhome/gap"
>>
>> (where the -l option was added because I prefer not to act as a superuser,
>> leaving this privilege to my wife), and then wrote
>>
>> gap> LoadPackage("PL");
>>
>> there was *no more* such problem.
>>
>> So, thank you again, and the question is: what will you recommend me to do
>> next?
>>
>> Igor
>>
>>
>>
>> 05.04.2011, 15:46, "Alexander Konovalov" <alexander.konova...@gmail.com>:
>>> Dear Igor,
>>>
>>> On 5 Apr 2011, at 07:34, Igor Korepanov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Forum,
>>>>
>>>> We are writing our new GAP package called PL, which stays for
>>>> "piecewise-linear" topology and mathematical physics. As some functions
>>>> already work, I think we will make it available for public (support and)
>>>> critisism soon.
>>>>
>>>> However, when GAP reads our package, it writes out:
>>>>
>>>> #I method installed for UnderlyingField matches more than one declaration
>>>>
>>>> How can I fish out and fix this bug?
>>>
>>> There is a large chance that this is a problem with a different package -
>>> for example,
>>> I can reproduce it when I start GAP 4.4.12 with -A option (so no autoloaded
>>> packages
>>> are loaded), but without -r option (so it reads my .gaprc file and loads
>>> packages
>>> stated there).
>>>
>>> Could you try to start GAP with -r -A options and then do
>>>
>>> LoadPackage("PL");
>>>
>>> to check if the problem persists?
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Alexander
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forum mailing list
> Forum@mail.gap-system.org
> http://mail.gap-system.org/mailman/listinfo/forum
_______________________________________________
Forum mailing list
Forum@mail.gap-system.org
http://mail.gap-system.org/mailman/listinfo/forum
