This message is from the T13 list server.
Actually it pretty much ends the standards discussion, since no one I know of is today designing for Win95 in particular. i.e. making changes in today's UDMA to accommodate Win95 probably would not get a lot of support. Now if XP is doing something flaky.... Jim -----Original Message----- From: Pat LaVarre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [t13] the bad hosts that matter come from Washington? This message is from the T13 list server. Win95B is a concrete example of where saying Bad Host doesn't end the discussion. Anybody selling Atapi devices in 1996 had to cope with Win95B. Even now deciding whether to ignore Win95 is an open question. One of the features cited for Usb over 1394 is that low-speed Usb (keyboards, mice, ...) works ok back in Win95. Pat LaVarre >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/13/01 02:18PM >>> ... >On the host-side, I know Win95B couldn't transfer odd bytes in >response to any INTRQ DRQ: to work there the device has to move >even counts always. BAD HOST! ... Subscribe/Unsubscribe instructions can be found at www.t13.org. Subscribe/Unsubscribe instructions can be found at www.t13.org.
