This message is from the T13 list server.


Well given that recent discussion with a few people and finding out the
EFF may be coming to their senses about the silliness of their position.
Where as during the Austin T13 February 2001 meeting, where my memember
ship was invalided for just cause, I had planned to make a friendly
ammendment to reach the middle ground.  Given the lightening bolts
associated w/ the topic, only a civil compromise to require a selectable
feature set with lockable modes, could make everyone happy.  I would need
to exclude the extremes of the world.

For the record, I was working to encourage the 4C folks to adopt a
position acceptable to the majority, including nyself.  This would have
permitted the inclusion of CPRM (optional op codes) with a "manditory"
locking set for the enduser to control.

Understanding the customer for the various drive companies are the big
box-builders (Compaq, Dell, Gateway, HP, et al.) and the growing embedded
market place for Settop and appliance products, the noise the average
Joe-SixPack was making just inflamed the issue.

Now it appears the OSS folks are adopting HOSTS which are scoped for CPRM
like products and dual design modes for non-appliance usage, it just can
not be had both ways.

Since we have the DMCA/SSSCA about to force us to make this manditory in
the worst case (always enabled), we may wish to address it before hand and
adopt the desirable enable/disable lockable features.  This would allow
for the corporate business world to disable in environments which are
inappropriate, the average user who does not want the feature, and the
hollywood types that want to dictate the meaning of "fair usage".

Given all OSes are going to be forced to support tainted hardware, this T
committee could walk the line and produce a document to prevent all sides
from attacking the technical aspect of the topic.

So I would be willing to take point and lead a proposal, provided a few
things were address, and tomorrow is another day.

Regards,

Andre Hedrick
CEO/President, LAD Storage Consulting Group
Linux ATA Development
Linux Disk Certification Project

On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Larry Barras wrote:

> This message is from the T13 list server.
> 
> 
> Slow newsday. I guess they needed the hits.
> 
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/23516.html
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe instructions can be found at www.t13.org.
> 

Subscribe/Unsubscribe instructions can be found at www.t13.org.

Reply via email to