This message is from the T13 list server.

I haven't yet seen the intro, but I can reply to the proposal.

My proposal (November?) last year was:

a) Flip a bit in the op xA1 IdentifyPacketDevice to say you are device that
bothers to report the bus residue, even for Dma, not just for Pio.

b) Report the bus residue in x1F5:1F4 ByteCount at BSY DRQ C/D I/O = 0 0 c i
StatusIn time.

Since then I've added c)

c) Also report x1F3 SectorNumber = x80 to say the device copied data In. 
Report x1F3 SectorNumber = x00 to say the device copied data Out.

In all the Atapi device silicon I know, this is a firmware change only, no
silicon change required.  Silicon that automagically reports Good status
despite the Atapi Data Fifo being not empty would have to learn to check for
that (rare) condition.

x4402 Pat LaVarre   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.aol.com/plscsi/


>>> Hale Landis 04/15/02 11:09AM >>>
This message is from the T13 list server.


This proposal was at the end of my previous message but just so
that it is not lost in your email in-box, here is just the
proposal.

Comments requested, especially from host adapter folks.

Hale's proposal follows:  Should Hale get a document number???

Pat wants a Byte Count for each DMA data burst just as we have Byte Count for
each PIO DRQ data blocks.  This BC must be transmitted from the device to the
host at some point in each DMA data burst.  On the host side these BC values
must be added up and made available to the host software.  Lets assume that we
are adding this feature to U-DMA because it is the only DMA we really want
people using in the future (SW DMA has been obsolete for years, and not
supported by ATA hosts for years; MW DMA probably should be made obsolete
sometime soon).

OK?  How about this?  For U-DMA we define a scheme where the CRC is replaced
by this BC value?  Or do we need to define an entirely new DMA protocol (how
about Enhanced Ultra DMA?) that has not only the CRC but the BC value?  We
need to find a way for the device to send the BC to the host and still allow
the host to
send the CRC to the device. Any ideas?



*** Hale Landis *** www.ata-atapi.com ***

Reply via email to