This message is from the T13 list server.
Pat, Clearly some of the joke was lost about third person humor. Regardless, the serious part of the discussion related to an inter-op testing out side of WHQL .... blah blah. The idea of using bus-analizers to address the goofball nature of ATAPI scares the heck out of me. The serious nature points to N different versions of ATAPI ship against N different dead, retired, active documents. This does not include the N versions of Pat, but that is another story and an attempt at humor. So how about presenting a table to show all the various paths people have taken to create the classic scsi (ends justify means) to describe possible FSM or whatever the represent. This would be useful and would allow many of us to actually see the point you are trying to make. Clearly this is a very important issue and of great concern for you. I have been told that consenses build is a useful tactic, yet given all males suffer from Y chromosone defects, this is generally a new method of attack to an old problem. Cheers, Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Pat LaVarre wrote: > This message is from the T13 list server. > > > > Subject: Re: [t13] Re: ata/pi pio/dma byte counting blogged > conclusion where > > I do believe progress on that subject has and continues to occur at: > > http://ide-byte-counting.blog-city.com/ > > I don't want to say more here now. I'd rather wait for results > offline, since we have before now demonstrated that we can't cheaply > get useful results from discussing this subject here. > > > Don't you find it a little odd to be quoting > > yourself to probe a point? > > This other subject does fascinate me, thank you, but I find this other > subject to be off-topic for t13 and I have no short answer. Also in > this medium I can't be sure if you meant to type "probe" or "prove". > Also I fear online metadiscussion growing without bound. > > In any case, I invite everyone interested in this other subject to > contribute to the world-writable: > > quoting yourself in the third person too often > http://plavarre.blog-city.com/read/430284.htm > > Pat LaVarre > http://udfko.blog-city.com/index.cfm?m=1&y=2004 >
