This message is from the T13 list server.

I'm leaning in Hale and Bob's direction as well (speaking as a RAID
implementer). However, we'll have to see how this proposal evolves.

I have general security concerns about WRITE "WRONG", but it's no worse
that the position today. (And it's really more of a complaint about
pass-through than the commands themselves) 

::>-----Original Message-----
::>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
::>Behalf Of Hale Landis
::>Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 3:31 PM
::>To: [email protected]
::>Subject: Re: [t13] WRITE LONG, SCT Write Long, and WRITE WRONG EXT
::>
::>This message is from the T13 list server.
::>
::>
::>Sheffield, Robert L wrote:
::>> I think when RAID vendors begin to use the WRITE WRONG commands in
::>> practice, we'll find the capability it offers will be weak 
::>with respect
::>> to what's needed for robust RAID algorithms.
::>
::>I would agree.  I don't see how Write Wrong has much value 
::>for any kind 
::>of RAID implementation. And I'm not sure how it would work when the 
::>physical sector contains more than one logical sector or how 
::>it works 
::>with the more complex ECC algorithms that will be used in the future.
::>
::>And related to this: I don't see how attempting to read and 
::>use the data 
::>in a sector that has an uncorrectable ECC error is much 
::>value either. 
::>Given today and future ECC algorithms it is likely that none 
::>of the data 
::>in a sector is of any value if there is an uncorrectable ECC error 
::>anywhere in the sector's data.
::>
::>Metadata? Cool... Define a way the host can store metadata 
::>associated 
::>with each sector on the disk - expand the basic sector size 
::>by 32 or 64 
::>bytes for the metadata and define new commands to access the 
::>metadata. 
::>(This would probebly be of more value to more people than 
::>that stupid NV 
::>cache thing.)
::>
::>Hale
::>
::>-- 
::>
::>++ Hale Landis ++ www.ata-atapi.com ++
::>
::>

Reply via email to