This message is from the T13 list server.
I'm not sure we have consensus on this and I'm not sure that was the original intent of that bit. It would appear (based on the discussions at the plenary and side discussions I've had with people) that some drives implement this as a read cache enable/disable others implement it differently. ::>-----Original Message----- ::>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On ::>Behalf Of Joseph Chen - SISA ::>Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 5:44 PM ::>To: Hale Landis; [email protected] ::>Subject: RE: [t13] Read Look Ahead ::> ::>This message is from the T13 list server. ::> ::> ::>Yes, if everyone agree on this. ::> ::>Regards, ::>Joseph ::> ::>-----Original Message----- ::>From: Hale Landis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ::>Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 10:06 PM ::>To: [email protected] ::>Subject: Re: [t13] Read Look Ahead ::> ::>This message is from the T13 list server. ::> ::> ::>On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:59:36 -0700, Joseph Chen - SISA wrote: ::>>This message is from the T13 list server. ::>>Is the Set Feature Enable/Disable Read Look Ahead (55h and ::>AAh) used as it ::>>is defined, or is the name for the Feature out of sync? ::> ::>Are you asking if the more correct name should be Enable/Disable Read ::>Cache? ::> ::>Hale ::> ::> ::>*** Hale Landis *** www.ata-atapi.com *** ::> ::> ::>
