This message is from the T13 list server.
You are right - rev 1 is missing. What is posted is this one > http://t13.org/docs2005/e05139r0-ACS-TrustedComputingCommands.pdf What we reviewed at the June meeting was revision 1 which seems, indeed, to not be posted. I will post this straight away. There will be a rev 2 coming (very soon), which will be synch'd with the latest T10 proposal and the latest comments from this week's T10 meetings. Thank You !!! ----------------------------------------------------------------- Jim Hatfield Seagate Technology LLC e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] s-mail: 389 Disc Drive; Longmont, CO 80503 USA voice: 720-684-2120 fax....: 720-684-2711 ========================================== "Mark Overby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] om> To Sent by: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc rg <[email protected]> No Phone Info Subject Available RE: [t13] Comments on TCG commands 07/13/2005 11:49 AM This message is from the T13 list server. I don't see r1 on the website. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 10:52 AM Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [t13] Comments on TCG commands This message is from the T13 list server. Last week I synched the latest T10 doc (05-157r1) with T13 (e05139r1) . I am waiting to publish the new T13 revision (e05139r2) until after this week's T10 comments have been received. Thank You !!! ----------------------------------------------------------------- Jim Hatfield Seagate Technology LLC e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] s-mail: 389 Disc Drive; Longmont, CO 80503 USA voice: 720-684-2120 fax....: 720-684-2711 ========================================== "Mark Overby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] om> To Sent by: <[email protected]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc rg No Phone Info Subject Available [t13] Comments on TCG commands 07/13/2005 10:40 AM The T10 and T13 proposals for TCG use different field names. Can we please coordinate these two for consistent field names? Jim, can you do this?
