At 09:00 AM 5/15/01 +1000, Ian Wilson wrote:
>Also, for a number of reasons we have decided that supporting undo of the
>inversion is not an option for us.
Running the inversion twice with the same reference line should effectively
undo it. That, in fact, would be a good (though partial) test of the
accuracy of the inversion. A doubly-inverted file -- unless you put some
flags in it -- should be exactly the same as the original file.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Abdulrahman Lomax
P.O. Box 690
El Verano, CA 95433
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/subscrib.html
* - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
