On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 17:47 +0200, Sander van Grieken wrote: > On Monday 17 May 2010 01:26:18 John Stowers wrote: > > > > > > > I suspect I do the former. If this is a problem then I could change to > > > > ensure that I set the property through the GObject machinery. > > > > > > Looking it over, "tiles-queued" isn't even settable: but that makes > > > sense--I don't know what it would even mean to set something like that. > > > > > > I believe you just need to include a call to g_object_notify() wherever > > > you're doing something that may change the reported value. > > > > > > cf. attached patch. > > > > Thanks, applied > > For whoever is interested, I have put online my working branch where I'm > integrating the > OsmGpsMap widget here : > > http://www.outrightsolutions.nl/~sander/foxtrotgps/ogm-widget/ > > Currently I have migrated GPS updates and the map popup menu, so it is > runnable and gives > an idea of how it'll become. The rest of the functionality is not yet in a > working state, > so expect no POIs, photos, friends etc.
Cool, sounds great! > > Some things I noticed : > > It seems the tiles-queued signal is only triggered when downloading tiles > 'on-demand', > i.e. when dragging the map around. There are no events triggered when doing > an explicit > map download. OK, this sounds like a bug. > > Also I triggered a 'bug', where I had a huge bbox en a high zoom level (I > accidently used > the old global_zoom variable instead of the internal zoom variable) when > starting a map > download. It ate all my memory. This normally shouldn't happen, because the > app will use a > sane zoom level w.r.t. the bounding box, but maybe some sort of sanity check > in OGM is a > good idea. Yeah, I have had this before, where it goes and calculates a million tiles to download if you try and cache the whole world at all zoom levels. What do you think a sensible sanity check would be? > > Third issue is that old foxtrotgps also renders a 'bearing' arrow that points > to the set > waypoint, and a distance indicator. AFAICS this is not supported by OGM. > Personally I > don't care much about the waypoint functionality, but others might find it > useful. What do > you think? I suspect this is something that should be handled by the Overlay/OSD stuff, although I am not totally opposed to adding it to osm-gps-map, as it already contains some GPS specific functionality. > > grtz, > Sander > _______________________________________________ > This message is sent to you from [email protected] mailing list. > Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your > subscription > For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS _______________________________________________ This message is sent to you from [email protected] mailing list. Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your subscription For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
