Timo Juhani Lindfors <[email protected]> writes: > > Aapo Rantalainen <[email protected]> writes: > > http://www.foxtrotgps.org/build.html > > > > 1) on instructions: libglade2.0 might be libglade2-dev > > 2) libgps-dev is needed but not in list > > Thanks for reporting these! These two are indeed missing from the > build page. I pinged rozzin on IRC in the hope that he has write > access to the web page. A bug tracking system would be nice so that > this does not get forgotten... :-)
Oh, it's not even close to being forgotten--I've applied a fix :) > > 2B) minimum version of libgps? > > At least libgps 2.94-2 has been tested to work. I think >= 2.90 should work; at least, it doesn't look like the soname has changed since before 2.90 was released. I guess we should actually have a check in ./confgure that checks the version of libgps and aborts if a sufficiently-high version is not available.... > > With Ubuntu 9.10 (libgps 2.39-5) I got: > > gps_functions.c: In function ‘cb_gpsd_data’: > > gps_functions.c:720: error: ‘struct gps_data_t’ has no member named ‘dop’ There's a sufficient version of libgps-dev in Ubuntu as of 10.04 (Lucid); in Debian, libgps-dev 2.94 is available in Squeeze (Debian's current `testing' branch), and appears to install and work fine on Debian 5.0 (Lenny); I don't know about Ubuntu, but I'd bet that one can install the libgps packages from Lucid on Karmic--libgps is very light on dependencies. Is it worthwhile trying to support both the new and old libgps APIs, do you think? -- "Don't be afraid to ask (λf.((λx.xx) (λr.f(rr))))." _______________________________________________ This message is sent to you from [email protected] mailing list. Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your subscription For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
