John Stowers <[email protected]> writes: > > > > ... and probably some more, but a full review is going to take > > > more time that I have available tonight--and this list is > > > getting to the point where I might as well just do the > > > cherry-picks. ;) > > > > While this sounds like something you guys need to agree on amongst > > yourselves, allow me to make a few observations, especially as they > > relate to osm-gps-map, because AFAICT some of the directions you guys > > have been working in have been a little orthogonal. > > Just a subtle ping, have you guys reached a consensus yet?
Right on cue--I did say to give me `about another week, hopefully not much more than'... exactly 1 week ago, didn't I? :) I'm about half-way done reading through Sander's changes, mainly because I've spent most of my available time so far finishing up my own pre-release work (the GUI has now been fully converted to GladeXML, there's a new application icon that should work on all backgrounds, there were a few more inherited bugs that I found and had to fix before I could finish testing my changes and comparing the updated behaviour against the last version of tangoGPS, and I'm just finishing a draft of the NEWS file right now). I'm not very far into looking over your new API, but I like what I see so far. Have you had any thoughts on how we should get the zoom-decoupling into osm-gps-map? -- "Don't be afraid to ask (λf.((λx.xx) (λr.f(rr))))." _______________________________________________ This message is sent to you from [email protected] mailing list. Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your subscription For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
