David,
Joshua,
the tool: well, you compare texinfo and asciidoc. At the end its a
personal taste, what tool to prefer. I think, they both have advantages
and disadvantages and are very similar.
AsciiDoc is a little more less "markup", than texinfo is. Therefore the
source is a little bit more readable. On the other hand, the tool chain
for texinfo is much more stable and robust and a well-proven path.
As Joshua is the main responsible person behind foxtrotgps I tend to let
him decide and he seems to prefer texinfo. That is absolutely fine to me.
So I propose to use texinfo.
The license stuff: You propose CC-BY-SA 3.0 which is fine for Fedora
(and probably most others). Fedora declares this as "good" on their
license page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses_2
This is also true for GNU FDL.
So I support Joshuas proposal: texinfo + CC-BY-SA 3.0
The most important part for me was to get a manual into foxtrotgps which
is more than manual page/readme. I am happy to see this being discussed
now and even more, being decided and done. I offer my help for whichever
system gets selected.
:-)
Kind regards,
Till
_______________________________________________
This message is sent to you from [email protected] mailing list.
Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your
subscription
For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
