Hi,
1)Yes, RTKLIB uses NEO7P just fine
2) I know most of these:
http://gpsworld.com/a-comparison-of-free-gps-online-post-processing-services/
want dual frequency, but perhaps at least a couple will digest your
single frequency-
I used this a few times:
http://www2.unb.ca/gge/Resources/PPP/OnlinePPPs.html
http://www2.unb.ca/gge/Resources/PPP/SubmitData.html
3) don't know
4) I am not sure I understand the question
Cheers,
Mic
On 08/05/2014 20:10, Paul wrote:
[I apologize if an another version of this message appears]
In an effort to locate my antenna I collect data with an LEA-6T that I
process with RTKLIB and send to CSRS-PPP.
Last summer Tomoji TAKASU said:
u-blox 7 does not provide T-version of the module
at this moment.
RTKLIB requires T-version like LEA-5T or LEA-6T
to utilize raw pseudorange and carrier-phase.
So
1) Is the problem with the -7 module the lack of fixed position or is
a -7P a suitable of raw data for RTKLIB?
2) Is anyone other than CSRS doing (free) single frequency static PPP
3) My CSRS estimate is ~ 0.2m offset from my RTKLIB average (and with
a much larger bounding box). Is that expected?
4) I discard non PPP records from the .pos file. Might this cause
issues with any downstream software?
Is the best place for RTKLIB questions -- particularly given the fact
that I'm not really interested in kinematics.
_______________________________________________
This message is sent to you from [email protected] mailing list.
Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your
subscription
For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
_______________________________________________
This message is sent to you from [email protected] mailing list.
Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your
subscription
For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS