Hi,

1)Yes, RTKLIB uses NEO7P just fine

2) I know most of these:
http://gpsworld.com/a-comparison-of-free-gps-online-post-processing-services/
want dual frequency, but perhaps at least a couple will digest your single frequency-
I used this a few times:
http://www2.unb.ca/gge/Resources/PPP/OnlinePPPs.html
http://www2.unb.ca/gge/Resources/PPP/SubmitData.html

3) don't know
4) I am not sure I understand the question

Cheers,
Mic


On 08/05/2014 20:10, Paul wrote:
[I apologize if an another version of this message appears]

In an effort to locate my antenna I collect data with an LEA-6T that I process with RTKLIB and send to CSRS-PPP.

Last summer Tomoji TAKASU said:

   u-blox 7 does not provide T-version of the module
   at this moment.

   RTKLIB requires T-version like LEA-5T or LEA-6T
   to utilize raw pseudorange and carrier-phase.

So
1) Is the problem with the -7 module the lack of fixed position or is a -7P a suitable of raw data for RTKLIB?
2) Is anyone other than CSRS doing (free) single frequency static PPP
3) My CSRS estimate is ~ 0.2m offset from my RTKLIB average (and with a much larger bounding box). Is that expected? 4) I discard non PPP records from the .pos file. Might this cause issues with any downstream software?

Is the best place for RTKLIB questions -- particularly given the fact that I'm not really interested in kinematics.


_______________________________________________
This message is sent to you from [email protected] mailing list.
Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your 
subscription
For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS

_______________________________________________
This message is sent to you from [email protected] mailing list.
Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your 
subscription
For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS

Reply via email to