Most of the time a satellite set unhealthy by the control segment can still be tracked fine, it's just that its actual orbit is expected not to be as well described by the broadcast ephemerides due to a sudden maneuver.
Also, you didn't mention if the data were being processed in point positioning; in relative positioning, a satellite has to be visible from both stations (rover and base) to be usable. -F. > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:43:02 -0400 > From: "Sean Hyde" <[email protected]> > To: "'Open Source GPS-related discussion and support'" > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [FOSS-GPS] High SNR Satellites not being used > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > That?s a great resource! > > > > Unfortunately, the period was approx. 12-4PM on Sept 23, 2014 (Eastern US) > and 06 is actually tracking OK. 02, 05 and 25 are all showing 50 dBHz and > yet not being used. Very strange. > > > > -Sean > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Felipe G. Nievinski > Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 4:39 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [FOSS-GPS] High SNR Satellites not being used > > > > Maybe PRN06 was set unhealthy? > > You didn't mention the tracking period. > > > > Check the NANUs, e.g.: > > <http://celestrak.com/GPS/NANU/2014/nanu.2014057.txt> > > > > CONDITION: GPS SATELLITE SVN67 (PRN06) WAS UNUSABLE ON JDAY 198 (17 JUL > 2014) BEGINNING 0950 ZULU UNTIL JDAY 198 (17 JUL 2014) ENDING 1507 ZULU. > > > > Historical outages here: > > > > <http://adn.agi.com/SatelliteOutageCalendar/GPSHistoricalOutages.aspx> > > > > -F. > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:00:05 -0400 > From: "Sean Hyde" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > To: <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > Subject: [FOSS-GPS] High SNR Satellites not being used > Message-ID: <[email protected] <http://gmail.com> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hey Guys, > > > > I noticed today that despite some satellites having >40 dBHz (as reported > in > RTKNavi), they are not green and are not being used. They are also not > marked as 'OK' in the RTKMonitor. Any idea why? I do not have any > specifically excluded in the 'Options' settings and I have the Elevation > Mask set to zero. > > > > I've attached a screenshot of the SNR from RTKNavi (the Rover is inside a > building so that's why it is so low, but the base station is outside). > > > > Thanks, > > -Sean > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20140923/3d1b4cba/attachment.html > > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: High SNR.PNG > Type: image/png > Size: 31643 bytes > Desc: not available > URL: < > http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20140923/3d1b4cba/attachment.png > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > FOSS-GPS mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps > > End of FOSS-GPS Digest, Vol 68, Issue 14 > **************************************** > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20140923/dab036a5/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > FOSS-GPS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps > > End of FOSS-GPS Digest, Vol 68, Issue 15 > **************************************** >
_______________________________________________ This message is sent to you from [email protected] mailing list. Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your subscription For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
