> > Thanks for your information but I do not think dividing a nation is an > optimal solution. > > AFAIK, it's more or less related to "racism". But if racism itself is > properly documented and legislated, then anyone who is a racist would be > prosecuted. right ? So, my question remains, why would madhesi people > try to do a riot and then also try to create a seperate nation instead > of pushing things legally and mandating the laws? Is this some kind of > backing from India ? Indian people should mind their own business if so. > > This is Nepali issue and should be handled by Nepali goverment. > >
maoist never really addressed or represented madhesh's issues because they didnt had that much of hold at that reason. and they use the words like representing minority too.... for the country etc but in reality like it looks their words also echoed as FOR THE PEOPLE WHO SUPPORTED US (not for the country as a whole as i seems) politicians (as a whole) have always backed and represented racism, groupism. Never a country as a whole. From a pure political point of view (opposite of national intrest) why would they wanna make further shares in their power anyways... before there were politicians advocating/representing a group of ppl. then maoist....... with a group of people and now madhesh friends. And gov.... were saying stuffz like government ma sabai jana ko representation...... addressing countries problem..... etc but in reality they were representing a groups problem as always and always will. I am not into much of politics or understand that much but that's what i see from a layman point of view. -bipin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ FOSS Nepal mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/foss-nepal Community website: http://www.fossnepal.org/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
