This can be a very good article for our FM program. As suggested can we
translate it to Nepali and push it for the program. Can be very helpful

On 5/20/07, Puran Thapa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> FOSS Nepal is relay helping me do work in FOSS environment which is the
> demand of  time.
>
> Thank you.
>
> On 5/20/07, Amit Aryal < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ya always  useful one...for all those who seek differences..........
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/19/07, Prasanna Gautam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm not the writer of this  thing.. I just ripped it off
> > >
> > http://dmartin.org/weblog/things-i-can-do-in-linux-that-i-cant-do-on-windows
> > .
> > >
> > >
> > > Things I can do in Linux that I can't do on Windows.
> > > > Submitted by dmartin < http://dmartin.org/members/dmartin> on Sat,
> > > > 03/03/2007 - 1:06pm.
> > > >
> > > >    - Linux <http://dmartin.org/weblog/categories/linux >
> > > >    - Open Source <http://dmartin.org/weblog/categories/open-source>
> > > >
> > > > Since I often hear from friends and people on the Internet about
> > things
> > > > they can't do in Linux that they could on Windows, I thought I'd
> > write up
> > > a
> > > > list of things I can do in Linux that I can't do in Windows.
> > > >
> > > >    1. *Update every single piece of software on my system with a
> > single
> > > >    action.  *This is one of the main reasons I run Linux.  Sure,
> > > >    Windows has Windows Update, but that only updates the operating
> > system,
> > > >    Office, and a few other things.  For every Linux distribution
> > I've used
> > > >    (Gentoo, Red Hat, Suse, Ubuntu), updating is simple.  When you
> > update,
> > > you
> > > >    have every application, every library, every script - every
> > single
> > > piece of
> > > >    software upgraded automatically for you.  And on most of them,
> > they
> > > will
> > > >    check for updates automatically and notify you.  This is great
> > for
> > > security,
> > > >    fixing bugs quickly, and getting the latest in features.
> > > >    2. *Update nearly everything on my computer without a
> > reboot.*  On
> > > >    Linux, there is only one thing that requires a reboot after
> > updates.
> > > The
> > > >    kernel.  And even then you can continue to run on the previous
> > kernel.
> > > You
> > > >    just need to reboot to get the benefit of using the new kernel
> > (say, if
> > > it
> > > >    has a bug fix or a new feature).  In Windows, many of the updates
> > to
> > > even
> > > >    non-critical software require reboots.
> > > >    3. *Keep my system secure without software that consumes my
> > system
> > > >    resources, requires my time, and frequently nags me*.  Basic
> > > >    requirement for a secure Windows box include:
> > > >       1. Running antivirus protection.  AV software consumes
> > > >       resources and requires routine scans.
> > > >       2. A software firewall like ZoneAlarm or the one built into
> > > >       Vista that constantly asks you if you want to allow software
> > to
> > > contact the
> > > >       Internet.  More time on your part.
> > > >       3. Running Adblock Adaware and/or Spybot Search & Destroy on a
> > > >       routine basis, consuming your time, and requiring your manual
> > > intervention.
> > > >       People often forget or don't "get around to it".
> > > >       4. Never trusting software.  You have to go through life
> > > >       assuming every bit of software and every website on the
> > Internet is
> > > going to
> > > >       screw you over.  What a sorry state of affairs that is.
> > > >
> > > >    All of this requires your attention, slows your computer, and
> > ruins
> > > >    the open experience of the Internet.  None of this is necessary
> > in
> > > Linux.
> > > >    You get your software through your distribution.  As long as you
> > can
> > > trust
> > > >    your distribution, you can trust the software available.  Having
> > a
> > > firewall
> > > >    is a good thing even in Linux, but most of us have a firewall
> > built
> > > into our
> > > >    Cable and DSL modems, or our wi-fi router.  A software firewall
> > in
> > > windows
> > > >    is as much used to keep malware from calling out as it is to keep
> > > outside
> > > >    intrusions from coming in, and you don't have the same concerns
> > in
> > > Linux
> > > >    (since, as I said, you can trust your software).
> > > >    4. *Run an entire operating system for free without pirating
> > > >    software, and without breaking the law.*  Most Window's users
> > seem
> > > >    to accept that breaking the law is okay, because it is pretty
> > much
> > > >    required.  Either you break the law, or spend countless thousands
> > of
> > > dollars
> > > >    on the software you need.  You may not think it is a big deal,
> > but if
> > > you
> > > >    own a home like I do, you are putting it at risk.  While
> > unlikely, the
> > > >    potential is there for software companies to come after you just
> > like
> > > the
> > > >    RIAA has come after countless people.  With Linux, this isn't
> > > necessary.
> > > >    You can run the software you need without paying for it, and
> > without
> > > >    breaking the law.  I know I sleep better at night.
> > > >    5. *Take my settings with me where ever I go.*  In Linux, all
> > your
> > > >    personal settings are stored in your Home folder, most in folders
> > that
> > > begin
> > > >    with a period (like .gaim).  So, I can copy all these settings
> > from one
> > > >    computer to another.  I can put these settings on a USB
> > drive.  When I
> > > >    switched from Gentoo to Ubuntu, I kept all my settings.  On
> > Windows,
> > > some
> > > >    settings are under your home folder and some are in the
> > registry.  So
> > > your
> > > >    settings are not portable.
> > > >    6. *Run Internet Explorer 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, and 7.0 on the same
> > > >    desktop. * I have all installed thanks to the wonderful
> > > IEs4Linux<http://www.tatanka.com.br/ies4linux/>project.  I can even
> > run them
> > > side-by-side if I want.  For a web developer,
> > > >    that's huge.  Testing browser compatibility to that level on
> > Windows
> > > >    requires multiple machines or something like VMWare.  Further,
> > when I
> > > run IE
> > > >    under Linux, I don't have to worry about any malware or virus
> > getting
> > > onto
> > > >    my system.
> > > >    7. *Understand everything that is going on in my
> > computer.  *Using
> > > >    Windows is like working with a black box.  You can see the
> > outside, but
> > > you
> > > >    have no idea what is going on inside.  If you hit snags, your
> > only
> > > option is
> > > >    to hope Microsoft fixes it.  Or, perhaps you can submit a bug
> > report to
> > > >    Microsoft, spending *your time* improving software that  a
> > company
> > > >    makes billions from.  Under Linux, you can look at the system
> > logs,
> > > where
> > > >    you can see most issues.  You can search for the log messages on
> > > Google, and
> > > >    can usually track the cause and often find a fix.  If not, I can
> > even
> > > go
> > > >    look at the source code to find the offending problem.  Granted,
> > most
> > > people
> > > >    aren't capable or don't have the time to look at the source
> > code.  But
> > > the
> > > >    fact that tens-of-thousands of geeks do is often very, very
> > helpful.
> > > And if
> > > >    you do spend the time filling out a bug report, you are helping
> > other
> > > people
> > > >    just like yourself, not contributing your time to a rich software
> >
> > > company.
> > > >    8. *Customize every aspect of my desktop.*  In Windows, you are
> > more
> > > >    or less stuck with what you are given.  Sure, you can install
> > buggy
> > > skinning
> > > >    engines, or you can pay Microsoft extra for the ability to put
> > skins on
> > > your
> > > >    desktop.  But even these aren't very adaptive.  It's just a new
> > coat of
> > > >    paint on the same desktop.  Under Linux, I can choose the window
> > > manager,
> > > >    the desktop environment, the theme, the GTK engine, the icon
> > theme, the
> > > >    special effects (see Beryl or Compiz), the filesystem browser,
> > and so
> > > on.
> > > >    Nearly every aspect of the system has competitive options.  If
> > you look
> > > >    around the internet at screenshots of various Linux desktops, you
> >
> > > rarely see
> > > >    two that look the same.
> > > >    9. *Benefit from competition between projects for each system on
> > my
> > > >    computer.* As I mention in point 8, there are options for every
> > > >    aspect of the Linux desktop.  Not only is it fun to try the
> > various
> > > options,
> > > >    but it leads to better software as multiple projects compete
> > against
> > > each
> > > >    other to be the best.  Can you imagine competing printing
> > backends,
> > > >    competing desktop environments, or competing USB mounting systems
> > on
> > > >    Windows?  I've been a Linux user for 3 years now, and I've seen
> > > remarkable
> > > >    changes in systems used on the Linux desktop, from critical
> > systems
> > > (XFree86
> > > >    switched to X.Org, auto-mounting systems) to non-critical  (my
> > > >    CD-Rom eject button works!).
> > > >    10. *Run thousands of great pieces of software that only run on
> > > >    Linux.*  Just like Windows, Linux has software that doesn't run
> > on
> > > >    Windows.  Great pieces of software like Amarok<
> > http://amarok.kde.org/>,
> > > >    Bluefish <http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/>,
> > > Neverball<http://icculus.org/neverball/>,
> > > >    Gnumeric < http://www.gnome.org/projects/gnumeric/>,
> > > K3B<http://www.k3b.org/>,
> > > >    Beryl < http://www.beryl-project.org/>,
> > > gdesklets<http://www.gdesklets.de/>,
> > > >    and MythTV <http://www.mythtv.org/>.  I know this is a
> > > >    chicken-and-egg point, where Windows has the exact same
> > situation. Too
> > > often
> > > >    I hear "I can't switch to Linux because it doesn't run [insert
> > Windows
> > > >    software]".  My reason for pointing it out is just to make it
> > clear
> > > that
> > > >    this is a two-way street.
> > > >    11. *Learn about, support, and appreciate the value of free
> > > software<http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html >
> > > >    .*  I believe free software is important to us all.  Even if you
> > use
> > > >    non-free software, the free software movement ensures checks and
> > > balances on
> > > >    non-free software by offering an alternative.  By running a free
> > > operating
> > > >    system and becoming involved in the community, I've contributed
> > to free
> > > >    software, even if only in a small way.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The main point I frequently try to make is that you can't expect
> > features
> > > > to be 1-to-1 when switching operating systems.  We like Adobe
> > Photoshop or
> > > > Microsoft Office because we have used it for years, and we are
> > *used* to
> > > > it.  We hate change.  It's natural that people have a desire for
> > > everything
> > > > to be identical.  Did we expect Windows to be exactly like something
> > else
> > > > when we started using it?  Probably not.
> > > >
> > > > When you learn closed-source proprietary software like Photoshop or
> > > > Office, you have spent *your time* indenturing yourself to a
> > lifetime of
> > > > spending $700 every so many years.  And the same goes for every
> > company
> > > you
> > > > work for that you insist you need Office or Photoshop.  And if you
> > don't
> > > > think that your company's expenses affect your salary, think again.
> > > >
> > > > Conversely, if you take the time to learn open and free systems like
> > > > Linux, Gimp, or OpenOffice, you now have given yourself a lifetime
> > of
> > > > perpetually free software.  The value of that is quite profound.  No
> > more
> > > > worrying about installing Office on more than one computer and
> > running
> > > into
> > > > activation issues.  I have OpenOffice installed on all 5 computers I
> > own,
> > > > *and my flash drive <http://www.portableapps.com/>* where I can run
> > it on
> > > > any computer I wish.
> > > >
> > > > Bottom line is, yes, you will have to spend time learning Linux and
> > the
> > > > software running on Linux if you choose to switch.  But by doing so,
> > > you've
> > > > set yourself up for a lifetime of free computing.  For many of you,
> > that's
> > > > going to be 40, 50, 60, 70 years.  A period of learning isn't so
> > hard to
> > > > swallow, when you can see the value of doing so.
> > > >
> > > > My advice, should you choose to try Linux, is to forget about making
> > it
> > > > exactly like Windows.  You will spend countless hours, and you will
> > fail.
> > > > Once you spend signicant time on Linux, every time you use a Windows
> > > > computer you will say "Bah, I could do xyz if I was on Linux".
> > > >
> > > > If you are a Linux user, and you have other things you think should
> > be on
> > > > this list, please contribute comments below.
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > > >
> >


-- 
Shishir Jha
EPC 1970,GPO 8975,
KTM,NEPAL

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
FOSS Nepal mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/foss-nepal

Community website: http://www.fossnepal.org/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to