contextual replies is the best no doubt about that if you are answering a part or some part of the question.
But i still think that top posting is good. On 9/28/07, nepbabu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:46:04AM -0400, Ashes wrote: > > Top posting is the industry norm. You don't need to read through all the > > previous posts to get to the new post. Its easy and convenient.You can > look > > at the advantages of the top post in the same link provided by you. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post > > > > I know i would sound rude but i will top post. Its easy for most of the > > regular reader. I am really sorry and apologize to others. I am well > aware > > of the fact that it will decrease reverse the order of the reading. > > You do not have to think that you are sounding rude or have to apologize > by expressing your views. This is internet. Even a dog has a opinion here. > haha! :) > > > But since we are in google group we dont need to use usenet standard. If > you > > top post you message then google will hide the reply and you see it > easily. > > True :) But it helps poor souls like us who do not use Google groups and > uses a mail client. All in all, it helps tremendously to bring context out > of the topic the mail addresses and shows the reader that you are discussing > on topic as well. Otherwise, I do not think top posting is voilating the > discussiong principle so its fine with lot of users. > > All in all I believe, making contextual replies to a discussion (like the > one I have used above) is more important than top-posting or bottom-posting. > > -- > Cheers, > Bikal. > GPG: 0D8EAFB6 > > -- Regards AD --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ FOSS Nepal mailing list: [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/foss-nepal To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community website: http://www.fossnepal.org/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
