i'm quite surprised with this benchmark. i use gnome n it loads up under 200mb, but kde takes more than 300mb on my machine.. am i missin something?
regards, jwalanta. On 1/14/08, Zico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Jan 13, 2008 11:08 PM, Prasanna Gautam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hmm.. gotta try again. I had to remove kde4 rc2 due to some conflicts > > with apt. There are some innovative features in KDE for sure and might be > > the answer to the more "eye-candy seeking" linux users too. On the more > > functional side, it seems to add some nifty features but sometimes the lack > > of proper documentation for some features on the site might be deterrent to > > some programmers to start developing on the new platform just yet. The best > > thing about KDE4 imo is that it can run on windows too [Thanks to qt4] so > > that people can ease up on the movement to linux and linux nerds won't miss > > their favorite apps if forced to use windows for development. > > > > [ ... ] > > Man, i am really surprised to see the *benchmark* article of KDE and > GNOME. I thought that, my Gnome is saving my ram; whereas it actually > don`t. > > You people should look at this: > http://ktown.kde.org/~seli/memory/desktop_benchmark.html<http://ktown.kde.org/%7Eseli/memory/desktop_benchmark.html> > > > -- > Best, > Z > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ FOSS Nepal mailing list: [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/foss-nepal To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community website: http://www.fossnepal.org/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
