I have tested few other hypervisoers and for desktop virtualization, virualbox impressed me a lot . vmware-server is targeted for server level virtualization which may take a bit more resources ( but i have no data here). Personally i believe for desktop vmware-workstation (not free ) or virutalbox ( open) are the top solutions. I may be wrong here.
Paras On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Ishwor Gurung <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Try 3.0 . It should work for BSD > I did that already. But found VirtualBox runs slower compared (in > terms of pure execution speed) to VMware server. > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/current/0390.html has > more of my rants regarding this matter. Thanks but no thanks :-) I am > not really satisfied with their product. > -- > Regards, > Ishwor Gurung > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ FOSS Nepal mailing list: [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/foss-nepal To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] Mailing List Guidelines: http://wiki.fossnepal.org/index.php?title=Mailing_List_Guidelines Community website: http://www.fossnepal.org/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
