To be honnest I would have expected something way slower, so I'm
really happy with the current speed :) (of course any speed up is
always appreciated

2014-11-07 11:11 GMT+01:00 Baruch Burstein <bmburst...@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Baptiste Daroussin
> <baptiste.darous...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ok, maybe an option to disable that tag will be helpful :)
>> basically the bottleneck seems to be in CPU, and most of it is done
>> calling memcmp/memcpy
>
>
> Will do that when I have time. I think that there are probably many unneeded
> memcmp/memcpy that I can get rid of when I restructure/optimize. It is still
> a work in progress.
>
> --
> ˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
>
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-dev mailing list
> fossil-dev@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev

Reply via email to