What about branch "tk-diff-viewer? It would be nice to have a more powerful diff --tk
RR 2015-01-16 9:31 GMT+01:00 Jan Nijtmans <jan.nijtm...@gmail.com>: > 2015-01-15 21:49 GMT+01:00 Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org>: >> I just looked at the changes.wiki and there is still the following: >> >> Let fossil new no longer create an initial empty commit by >> default. The first commit after checking out an empty repository >> will become the initial commit. (NOT PLANNED FOR 1.30, BUT DONE >> TO EXPOSE fossil new --empty TO MORE FIELD TESTING BEFORE MAKING >> ANY DECISION ON IT!) >> >> Does this need to be updated before 1.30 is made? > > Yes, this needs to be updated. Assuming this change is accepted > for 1.30, I just removed the additional comment. > > Since chiselapp sometimes generates an additional "initial commit", > this change would be a perfect solution for the problem > discussed here: > > <http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.fossil-scm.user/18273> > > But I'm open for any reason why this would be a bad idea. All > corner-cases have been fixed now, the last one was reported > by Michai Ramakers in July: > > <http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.fossil-scm.user/17266> > > So, this feature is already tested for almost half a year with success by > many users ;-) > > Thanks, Andy, for the reminder! > > Regards, > Jan Nijtmans > _______________________________________________ > fossil-dev mailing list > fossil-dev@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev _______________________________________________ fossil-dev mailing list fossil-dev@lists.fossil-scm.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
