On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 08:09:20AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 5/5/15, Lluís Batlle i Rossell <vi...@viric.name> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > the 'ci' page of merge commits does not show the Added files, only the
> > modified.
> >
> > One example:
> > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/ci/106c0909e45e798ec04f87fb02204d1ccbfd5381
> >
> > I think it should show them; it's a bit confusing, otherwise.
> >
> 
> The current behavior is by design, not a bug.  The files were not
> really 'added' - they were only merged into the branch.  If we call
> this "added" then it really confuse the file history graph.
> 
> I will take this report as an enhancement request.
> 
> Currently Fossil only understands (1) File already exists and (2) File
> was added from nothing.  You are wanting a third possibility which is
> (3) File added by a merge from another branch.
> 
> Fixing this is probably going to involve a lot of work, a lot of
> testing, a schema change, and a "fossil rebuild".

Didn't Martin report that this was working before a commit of January? Was
this new design introduced in January?

I think it would be really helpful if merges showed added files in the
commit, comparing to it's primary parent.

Regards,
Lluís.

-- 
(Escriu-me xifrat si saps PGP / Write ciphered if you know PGP)
PGP key D4831A8A - https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/
_______________________________________________
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev

Reply via email to