Hi Joe,
sorry, but I don't understand your comment. I thought the behaviorthat
fossil does not see those files would be exactly what is wanted. E.g. you
can do a "fossil add ." in the root and you would only get the really new
files added and no build artifacts. Same with "extra" where you would see
directly which files are lying around besides those build artifacts. When
I've build fossil and do a "fossil extra" the list of files is so long that
it's hard for me to spot possibly missed out files for check-in.
So what do you think? Is it OK to add or rather not?
Thanks!
Chris
Am 15.08.2015 um 18:21 schrieb Joe Mistachkin:
That's not what ignore-glob does. It prevents "fossil extra" from seeing those
files.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 15, 2015, at 8:56 AM, Chris <ckolum...@ac-drexler.de> wrote:
Hi again
what would you think about updating the .ignore-glob to contain build artifacts
on Linux:
--- .fossil-settings/ignore-glob
+++ .fossil-settings/ignore-glob
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
compat/openssl*
compat/tcl*
fossil
fossil.exe
win/fossil.exe
+bld/*
+config.log
+Makefile
+autoconfig.h
IMHO it would help with identifying stray extra files when doing a 'fossil ext'
before commit.
Any side effects that I might have overlooked?
Chris
--
---
https://github.com/ckolumbus
https://sourceforge.net/u/ckolumbus
_______________________________________________
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
_______________________________________________
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
--
https://github.com/ckolumbus
https://sourceforge.net/u/ckolumbus
_______________________________________________
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
