Hello,

we went through memtest86+ with rowhammer test, and the google rowhammer
test, and those exhibited bitflips quickly.

Why memtest86 6.3.0 didn't find anything, I don't know. I told that to
them. You can check their answers:
http://www.passmark.com/forum/showthread.php?5993-Rowhammer-problem-not-found-by-memtest86-6-3-0

The short story is that the RAM seemed effectively fauly, but memtes86
6.3.0 didn't show any problem.

We asked for RAM replacement under warranty to the shop, and we got 4 new
DIMMs that pass all the tests.

Regards,
Lluís.

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 03:52:07PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> It's not so clear that we had a RAM problem... we were using memtest86+
> 4.20 that seems to consistenly report bad RAM in every computer we try it
> to, so we take that as false positives.
> 
> Running memtest86 6.3.0 it doesn't find any problem, so now we are
> wondering how we got those bits changed all of a sudden.
> 
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:42:10AM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I just checked with memtest86, and it found RAM problems at 43% of the
> > progress. Luckily that we didn't have more serious problems than this.
> > 
> > As for fossil, it did not even reach any sha1 checking. All quite blew up
> > just because of the silent uncompression failure. That definitely has to
> > be fixed in fossil.
> > 
> > As for gzip/miniz names, there is a cpp flag that makes miniz compatible 
> > with
> > gzip names: MINIZ_NO_ZLIB_COMPATIBLE_NAMES.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Lluís.
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:27:55AM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell 
> > > <vi...@viric.name>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Oh, I see that the content_of_blob(rid=1864) fails to uncompress it with
> > > > rc=-5 (MZ_BUF_ERROR).
> > > >
> > > 
> > > interestingly... that's miniz, not libz.
> > > 
> > > Other than that, i'm as puzzled as you are. i hope this wasn't a miniz 
> > > bug.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Then, it does:
> > > >    if( rc!=Z_OK ){
> > > >      blob_reset(&temp);
> > > >      return 1;
> > > >    }
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Is that right? Z_OK is a libz thing. Maybe miniz also defines it.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Here is the complete diff of xxd dumps of the 14MB blobs. It seems that
> > > > only a few bits where changed. Crazy.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > All it takes is 1 bit to change the sha1 :/.
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > ----- stephan beal
> > > http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
> > > http://gplus.to/sgbeal
> > > "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of
> > > those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby 
> > > Wolf
> > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > fossil-dev mailing list
> > > fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
> > > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > (Escriu-me xifrat si saps PGP / Write ciphered if you know PGP)
> > PGP key D4831A8A - https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/
> > _______________________________________________
> > fossil-dev mailing list
> > fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
> > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
> 
> -- 
> (Escriu-me xifrat si saps PGP / Write ciphered if you know PGP)
> PGP key D4831A8A - https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-dev mailing list
> fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev

-- 
(Escriu-me xifrat si saps PGP / Write ciphered if you know PGP)
PGP key D4831A8A - https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/
_______________________________________________
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev

Reply via email to