On Jul 6, 2017, at 8:22 AM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > Question 1: "References" seems like the wrong section label. But I > cannot come up with anything better. I also tried "Referenced By", > but that seems even worse. Suggestions?
“Cited by”? > Question 2: Should these backlinks also be shown directly on the > timeline in addition to being shown on the /info screen? Or would > that clutter the timeline too much? Adding something like “(Cited by [b9876])” after the checkin comment doesn’t seem very intrusive, especially given that this is going to be an uncommon case. > Question 3: Should we add a new "References" entry for any check-in > that cherry-picks the check-in being shown on the /info page? Or > perhaps cherry-picks should be shown in the "Context" section? If so, that argues against “Cited by,” since a cherrypick isn’t a citation. If there’s a way to distinguish the cases, I’d suggest something like “(Cherrypicked in [a1234])”. “In” rather than “as” because the merged text might have been modified or augmented in the checkin. _______________________________________________ fossil-dev mailing list fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev