On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:46:20 +0100, Stephan Beal <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Stephan Beal <[email protected]>
wrote:
the difference between the two numbers differs in different
repositories,
but info/stat consistently show _lower_ values. They use a different
query
for the counting than dbstat does, and that query is apparently not 100%
correct. Once we figure out why the "mlink" counts differ i'll feel
confident enough to swap out the queries used by info/stat.
FYI: Richard changed the query on the /stat page last night:
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/6bb63a7364
thanks for the info. questions: this does not effect the "off by one"
between timeline and dbstat
in the fossil repo itself, right?
remark: I see that the conversion from days to no. of years is done by
division by 365.24 and that
the conversion is labeled as 'approximately', which indeed it is.
I believe division by "365.2425" instead would make the
conversion "exact on average" even for projects running many hundred of
years ;-). actually,
I checked right now, that this is correct:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_year.
so I propose to insert the correct conversion factor and drop the
"approximately" from the report.
j.
so those numbers will match again.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
