2013/1/19 Lluís Batlle i Rossell <[email protected]>:
>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:48:59 +0100
>> Lluís Batlle i Rossell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > looking at the tcl timeline, I've just seen a checkin like this:
>> > http://core.tcl.tk/tcl/timeline?f=3c4edc83aae0e671
>> >
>> > What is that kind of usage? I feel strange that the "merge trunk" has
>> > arrows
>> > from *3 trunk leaves*, and *2 more checkins* from one of the trunk
>> > branches.
>> >
>> > What have they typed to achieve that merge? Why do they have multiple
>> > 'trunk'?
>> >
>> > I've no idea of how tcl development works, but I'd like to know what fossil
>> > usage pattern they use.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Lluís.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > fossil-users mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
In reality, there is only one continuous "trunk". I don't understand why
timeline splits them in multiple lines. The *2 more checkins* might only
be joined because they occurred on the same day (that's just a guess).
This looks like a fossil bug(let) to me.
The following timeline shows that "trunk" in reality is a single line:
http://core.tcl.tk/tcl/timeline?nd&n=40&r=trunk&c=2013-01-15
>Maybe because of a merge without committing, once trunk gets a new checkin,
>merge again, then again the same, until at the end you commit?
Yes, that's likely what happend.
Regards,
Jan Nijtmans
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
