On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:12:31PM +0100, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2014, at 16:00 , Martin S. Weber wrote: > > >> But I want Fossil to follow the latest SQLite alphas, not the latest SQLite > >> stables. That's the whole point: Fossil supports SQLite as a test > >> platform. SQLite stable has already been thoroughly vetted and tested and > >> there is little point in testing it further. I want Fossil to run with the > >> latest SQLite on trunk to smoke out bugs early. > > > > ...but fossil in itself is a pretty awesome piece of software, that's > > expected > > by its users to be stable -- at least for releases. > > I second this view, Fossil is definitely valuable on its own merit. > As such, its stable versions should not contain alpha-quality code from other > projects.
As for me, I think that fossil has showed that it works well enough at almost any trunk checkin. I understand that the named version sqlite has already been quite tested; a fossil release with it will only mean *more* tests for sqlite. It sounds good to me. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
