On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 23:24:33 +0100, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:19 PM, j. van den hoff
<veedeeh...@googlemail.com>wrote:


thanks for this. question: the output of `fossil search' is not
chronologically sorted. it should be in my view (top down, that is, from
new to old just as the timeline). is this intended behaviour?

another observation: I see strange hits in the search. e.g. (still for the
fossil timeline)

`fossil search abc' yields (upon others, obviously correct hits) a hit for
 rev. 94694585cd which seemingly is a commit with an empty commit
message... looks like a bug to me.


Yeah.  The whole "fossil search" command was an idea that I tried several
years ago.  But I didn't spend enough time on it to drive it to
completion.  It needs attention.  Do we have your contributor's agreement
on file?  Wanna help?

would if I could. but I'm afraid I'm not so much of a C programmer these days. for now, my 'solution" would be to use `fossil timeline -n 0 -W 0 | grep pattern' ...). anyway, if you let me know where to look exactly I might give it a try if I get around to it.




--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to