> Personally, I thought we were talking about practical UX stuff here, not 
> philosophy.

That's not really fair -- this discussion is *couched* in applicable
philosophies.

On 3/4/15, Warren Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 3:27 PM, bch <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Before you reject the idea of one-step rm totally
>>
>> Oh, to be clear, I'm presenting this as a thought exercise.
>
> If that's all this is, we can send it to the philosophy department and move
> on to other topics.
>
> Personally, I thought we were talking about practical UX stuff here, not
> philosophy.
>
>>> Many filesystems and OSes combine file versioning and file management
>>
>> Sure, but: fossil is distinct from the filesystems. DOS, ext<n>, ffs,
>> etc., etc., etc are not versioning/managment filesystems, and there
>> ought to be a principle-of-least-surprise/being-a-good-citizen kept in
>> mind.
>
> The principle of least surprise says that Fossil should behave like other
> VCSes. Fossil is odd-man-out for mv, and emulates #5 in popularity on the
> list of VCSes I surveyed for rm.  The principle says it should be emulating
> #1-3 instead.
>
> I'm ranking VCS popularity as git, svn, hg, cvs, bzr, fossil based on this
> table:
>
>   http://goo.gl/M7ogNH
>
> That matches pretty well with what I see used in the wild.
>
>> Is it
>> a Good Thing, or again, as case of overstepping bounds ? Honest
>> question.
>
> One of Fossil's primary virtues is uncommon simplicity for a DVCS.  It isn't
> as simple as svn, but wherever possible, it generally takes no more work to
> do something in Fossil as in svn.
>
> I'm proposing that we fix one of the remaining usability gaps.
>
>> I'll review your linked paper on hg for more ideas.
>
> It's just several brief paragraphs of text and a 5x5 table.  It'll only take
> you a few minutes to get through.
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to