I agree that making fossil semantics work the same as Hg would be
good. The change to mv looks perfectly reasonable. The only problem I
see with rm is that, at first blush (looking at the table):
hg rm -f foo
is the way to remove a newly added file. It's good, as in safe, but
it wouldn't occur to me (because rm -f in the shell is so total). And
I actually needed to do this a couple days ago. Actually, it turns
out that the right way to do it is:
hg forget foo
So I would endorse the change to "fossil rm" if we added a "fossil
forget" command.
../Dave
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
