On 11/2/15, Ron W <ronw.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:16 PM, bch <brad.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Philosophically, I think of links as build artifacts, which are rarely >> stored in an scm. I do avoid them as much as possible, but I've >> occasionally wondered: does anybody manage the links as the build >> artifacts >> of a script, and keep the script itself under version control? >> > We used to, but now use the vpath directive in GNU make, so longer need > symlinks.
After I posted this, I thought a Makefile (still to manage actual symlinks) would be an improvement over a shell script; you're punting on symlinks completely (using VPATH). How has VPATH (or the previous shell script) treated you as a symlink manager/replacement ? -bch > _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
