> Are you saying you would rather move it to a separate package than > remove it from the main package?
I'm saying it should remain the the upstream fossology tarball, but for Debian I can put it in a separate package that won't be required (the fossology-agents package will only Recommends instead of Depends). BTW one other thing that needs to be fixed for this to happen is that I'm not sure the selftest agent is able to deal with 'missing' agents. > Are you saying that we should keep it because someone somewhere might > use the data even though fossology doesn't? Yes. FOSSology is still sort of a one-trick-pony, but I think the metadata agent is something that fits into the bigger picture. -- Matt Taggart [email protected] _______________________________________________ fossology mailing list [email protected] http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
