Hi Bob,

I realize you guys have your hands busy and deep in the new release(s) of
fossology, but I just wanted to see if this was anywhere near completion
(v1.3 release)?

I'm installing our new server we got in last week and it's a monster!!!
However, with the postgres CPU utilization pegged most of the time (like I
mentioned in this thread) I wanted to know if installing the 1.3 release
would be possible for our RHEL5 64-bit monster-server.

I'm probably asking for the world here but again, just curious as far as how
close and/or timeline for this?

I'm going to install whatever latest release is out right now which appears
to still be fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm for me.

We were just hoping since we invested quite a bit of money into this new
server, we'd like to see the improvements on both the server-side and
hopefully any fixes on software side to help the psql stuff out. No way of
getting an early release v1.3 right? :-)

-Regards,
Gibran

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Gobeille, Robert <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Gibran,
> The scheduler does have some serious issues (I've seen what you are
> describing).  This really became apparent in the release we are working on
> (1.2) where the new license analysis agent is 20x faster than the one you
> are using.  I've been spending a lot of time on it but the solutions are
> pretty involved.  Right now we are planning on the 1.3 release to be where
> we fix the scheduler (and other issues).
>
> For now,
>
> 1) Are you only interested in license analysis?  If so, only ever start the
> license agent, not all the agents.  In other words, choose License Analysis
> but NOT  MIME-type Analysis, Metadata Analysis, or Spec File Analysis.
>  These other agents (especially pkgmettagetta does a LOT of database
> writes).
>
> 2) Since you already have these other agents running (you mention
> pkgmetagetta), go to the job queue display  (Jobs -> Queue -> Details) and
> delete that job.  This is probably the one causing the majority of your
> problems.
>
> 3) Check your Scheduler.conf to make sure it is not trying to run too many
> simultaneous processes.  If you want someone else to look at it, send it to
> the list.
>
> Bob Gobeille
>
>
> On Dec 21, 2009, at 6:12 PM, Furosh One wrote:
>
> Hey guys and gal,
>
> I'm not sure if this is truly a problem but my collegue uploaded a rather
> large amount of data to be processed and it appears to have been uploaded
> and scheduled correctly, however it seems like the server has postgres
> pegged at around 100% for the majority of the time.
>
> I was reading and searching your archives to see if I could find anyone
> else who had the same issue and only found this: "Error while uploading" on
> Fri, 22 May 2009 08:56:39 -0700
>
> After looking at some of the areas Bob suggested this guy check I thought I
> should look into each of those too.
>
>
>  >1) your scheduler is in some loop
>  >Do a top and see if fossology_scheduler is using lots of cpu time.
>
> This doesn't apply other than it's the Postgres process that is at 100%
>
>
>  >2) you need to do a vacuum analyze on your database
>
> It seems like the DB is doing a lot being at 100%, could I do this while
> its at 100%. It has 2 CPU's so (1)=100% and (2)= around 20% utilization.
>
>
>  >3) you are memory starved.
>
> We seem to be okay on memory, this server currently has 4GB RAM.
>
>  >4) your postgresql statement timeout is set very low
>
>  >In postgresql.conf the "statement_timeout" variable
>
> Our statement_timeout is #'d commented out,
> #statement_timeout = 0
>
> Should I change this?
>
> >5) your disk performance is poor (perhaps due to other processes)
>
> This doesn't seem to be an issue at the moment for us.
>
>
> In addition, the agents seem to spit off a small process like pkgmetagetta
> or licinspect every once in a while but ends really quick.
> I also look at the Scheduler / Status and it's updating and showing running
> on localhost and agents, but never seems to get to the filter_license or
> bsam_engine parts.
>
>
> Anyway, these questions weren't to me directly but was trying to look for
> help in your archive and thought I'd send you some info to go on to see if
> you had any suggestions or recommendation.
> Please let me know what I could check/do to correct this. I don't know much
> about DB optimization or administration on the database.
>
>
> -Regards,
> Gibran
>
> <ATT00001..txt>
>
>
_______________________________________________
fossology mailing list
[email protected]
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Reply via email to