Bob, The way we use fossology, removing timeout would we just fine. That said, I can see how someone with tighter requirements for controlling access to the scan results would prefer configurable timeout. The best of the two worlds might be to make it configurable, and make "infinite" timeout be the default configuration. But again, for my organization's use, removing timeout would be just fine.
-Drago On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Bob Gobeille <bob.gobei...@hp.com> wrote: > Hi Drago, > For the way you use fossology, would you prefer removing it or making it > configurable? > > Bob Gobeille > > > On Feb 17, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Dragoslav Mitrinovic wrote: > > I am also in favor of removing the timeout, or at least increasing it > substantially (the default value) and making it easily configurable. > > Best regards, > -Drago > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Bob Gobeille <bob.gobei...@hp.com>wrote: > >> I'd like to hear from other users as well. In the mean time, do you want >> me to send you a version without the timeout? If so, let's take this >> offline. >> >> Bob Gobeille >> >> On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Dave McLoughlin wrote: >> >> That would work for me. >> >> Thanks >> >> Dave >> >> >> On 2/17/11 8:41 AM, "Bob Gobeille" <bob.gobei...@hp.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Dave, >> How about if I remove the time out check? I don't think that level of >> security is really needed for fossology. >> >> Does anyone reading this have an opinion on the time out? >> >> On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:55 AM, Dave McLoughlin wrote: >> >> Fossology logs me out after a few minutes. Is there a way to configure it >> so it doesn’t time out and just leaves me logged in? >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fossology mailing list >> fossology@fossology.org >> http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology >> >> > >
_______________________________________________ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
