Yes!  We are closely following evolution of the SPDX standard.  We will 
eventually align FOSSology to adopt the standard.

Mary


Mary Laser
The FOSSology Project
http://fossology.org



> -----Original Message-----
> From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-
> boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Roger Meier
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:07 PM
> To: fossology@fossology.org; s...@fossbazaar.org
> Subject: [FOSSology] License Identifiers - FOSSology & SPDX
> 
> Hi all
> 
> I'm interested in using FOSSology and the SPDX standard for future
> projects.
> It would be great to have at least one well supported open source
> software
> solution like FOSSology which is using the SPDX standard. This will
> help all
> of us to be license compliant and economic whenever we use open source
> software.
> 
> However, SPDX is still in definition phase and it probably does not fit
> perfectly to FOSSology.
> The license meta data is a very important thing required to automate
> license
> analysis and that's the place where I've identified a  mismatch, the
> license
> short name or license identifier.
> 
> FOSSology has some very nice metadata for each license, e.g.
>     Date: 2004-01-01 00:00:00
>     URL: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>     shortname: ASL v2.0
>     fullname: Apache Software License v2.0
>     OSIapproved: Yes
>     FSFfree: Yes
>     GPLv2compatible: No
>     GPLv3compatible: Yes
>     copyleft: No
>     notes: ....
> for further details see
> http://fossology.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fossology/trunk/fossology/a
> gents
> /license_files/Apachev2.0.meta?revision=HEAD&view=markup
> 
> SPDX is using its own license identifier:
>     Full name of License: Apache License 2.0
>     License Identifier: Apache-2
>     Source/URL: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>     Notes:  This version was released: January 2004, This license is
> OSI
> certified
> for further details see
> http://www.spdx.org/wiki/working-version-license-list
> 
> Are there any plans to align these identifiers?
> Does somebody know some other standards used for license meta data?
> 
> -roger
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fossology mailing list
> fossology@fossology.org
> http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
_______________________________________________
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology

Reply via email to