Here's my vote, too. BSAM as used in older versions of FOSSology reveals matches (and derivations) easily.
Ivo -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] Im Auftrag von Bob Gobeille Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juli 2011 01:27 An: Dave McLoughlin Cc: fossology@fossology.org Betreff: Re: [FOSSology] License highlighting (Bob Gobeille) Oh - multiple pages. That is painful. Thanks for voting Dave. Bob Gobeille On Jul 28, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Dave McLoughlin wrote: > I'll cast my vote, highlighting is very important to us. We spend a lot of > time searching, scrolling and manually scanning contents to find a match > when there's no highlighting. > > It's extremely painful when the contents are displayed across multiple > pages. > > Dave > > > On 7/28/11 12:00 PM, "fossology-requ...@fossology.org" > <fossology-requ...@fossology.org> wrote: > >> Send fossology mailing list submissions to >> fossology@fossology.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> fossology-requ...@fossology.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> fossology-ow...@fossology.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of fossology digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: License highlighting (Bob Gobeille) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:05:56 -0600 >> From: Bob Gobeille <bob.gobei...@hp.com> >> Subject: Re: [FOSSology] License highlighting >> To: Mader Volker (AA-DGP/ESD2) <volker.ma...@de.bosch.com> >> Cc: "fossology@fossology.org" <fossology@fossology.org> >> Message-ID: <a29aa748-dd4b-4fac-a615-81abef73e...@hp.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> Hello Volker, >> The database table license_file is where nomos records what license matched >> in >> what file. There are columns for where in the file the match occurred, but >> they are not currently populated by nomos. >> >> Would anyone else like to vote on how important highlighting the license >> match >> is? >> >> Bob Gobeille >> >> >> On Jul 27, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Mader Volker (AA-DGP/ESD2) wrote: >> >>> yes, this is exactly what would be most useful. I think it is very important >>> to understand why a license was detected esp. for deciding on false >>> positives. Certainly the signature match is the interesting information >>> there. >>> My plan: In combination with the tags feature to mark false positives or >>> give >>> approval to special file/license pair... it can be used to manage the >>> findings more properly. >>> >>> So of course from my perspective this is quite important compared to most >>> other items ;-) >>> >>> Does nomos store the match information in the DB already? Could we "just" >>> use >>> some query in the php to display it? >> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> <http://fossology.org/pipermail/fossology/attachments/20110727/5d675e3f/attach >> ment.html> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fossology mailing list >> fossology@fossology.org >> http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology >> >> >> End of fossology Digest, Vol 45, Issue 13 >> ***************************************** > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > fossology mailing list > fossology@fossology.org > http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology _______________________________________________ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology _______________________________________________ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
