Hi Kotrappa, The reason is extracted license(the licenses not been defined in SPDX license list) is indexed as "LicenseRef-" in full spdx document. In your case, you can find "No_license_found" license is defined as "LicenseRef-3" in [email protected]_localhost.spdx.
Thanks, Venkata K Penmatsa Open Source Research Lab University of Nebraska On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:25 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Venkata, > > > > Thanks for information and clarification. > > > > Sorry, there was a mistake in localhost address instead of https, it > should be http. With https, always connection to localhost failed with wget > command. > > > > Now I could get .spdx out put from localhost. > > Please find the .spdx and logs files for both [fullSPDXFlag] flag set as > true and false, but why if fullSPDXFlag set to flase gives .spdx out put > with "No License Found" entries for all the files which have license if > [fullSPDXFlag] is set to true. > > > > Best regards > > Kotrappa > > > > > > *From:* Venkata Krishna Penmatsa [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, February 21, 2014 3:07 AM > *To:* Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing & Hi Tech) > *Cc:* Matt Germonprez; [email protected]; Liang Cao; > [email protected]; Akanksha Singh (WT01 - Manufacturing & Hi > Tech); Ravishankar T.S (WT01 - Manufacturing & Hi Tech) > *Subject:* Re: fossology Digest, Vol 75, Issue 18 > > > > Hi Kotrappa, > > > > We are looking into the SPDX document output issue and it would really > help us if you could provide logs while generating the SPDX document. > > > > I would also suggest you to try using > *https://localhost/repo/?mod=spdx_license_once&noCopyright=true&jsonOutput=true&fullSPDXFlag=true&packageNameInLog=time-1.7.tar > <https://localhost/repo/?mod=spdx_license_once&noCopyright=true&jsonOutput=true&fullSPDXFlag=true&packageNameInLog=time-1.7.tar>*. > Because > the SPDXFlag should be true to generate an SPDX document. > > > > Regarding your other questions: > > > > 1. Do you support fossology+spdx module as a package, which is easier to > upgrade by sudo apt-get command? Instead of everytime manually > uninstall/installing the module. > > > > This is a great suggestion and one that we have been considering. We will > keep you posted on any progress in this area and would welcome any support > as well. > > > > 2. Why fossology+spdx module does not have version information? > > > > Thank you very much for the suggestion and we have updated the version > information. Please find the VERSION file at:* > https://github.com/spdx-tools/fossology-spdx > <https://github.com/spdx-tools/fossology-spdx>* > > > > Thanks, > > Venkata K Penmatsa > > Open Source Research Lab > > University of Nebraska at Omaha > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Liang Cao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:46 AM > Subject: fossology Digest, Vol 75, Issue 18 > To: [email protected] > > > Send fossology mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fossology digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: query regarding fossology+spdx command line support > ([email protected]) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:45:26 +0000 > From: <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [FOSSology] query regarding fossology+spdx command line > support > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi Matt, > > Thanks for the information > I was able to get .spdx output from below command line from > fossologyspdx.ist.unomaha.edu server. > > wget -qO - --no-check-certificate --post-file=./time-1.7.tar --timeout=0 " > https://fossologyspdx.ist.unomaha.edu/?mod=spdx_license_once&noCopyright=false&jsonOutput=false&fullSPDXFlag=false&packageNameInLog=time-1.7.tar"; > > time-1.7.tar.spdx > > On fresh Ubuntu 13.10 system, today I installed Fossology 2.4.0, with > latest SPDX module as available from > https://github.com/spdx-tools/fossology-spdx by downloading zip file on > right hand side of the page. I wanted to try same command as above on > localhost server,but I did not get any output of spdx in localhost. > > wget -qO - --no-check-certificate --post-file=./time-1.7.tar --timeout=0 " > https://localhost/repo/?mod=spdx_license_once&noCopyright=false&jsonOutput=false&fullSPDXFlag=false&packageNameInLog=time-1.7.tar"; > > time-1.7.tar.spdx > > Is there something I am missing here. I assume the latest spdx source is > supporting [fullSPDXFlag]. > > Other general queries I do have are below. > > > 1. Do you support fossology+spdx module as an package, which is > easier to upgrade by sudo apt-get command? instead of everytime manually > uninstall/installing the module. > > 2. Why fossology+spdx module does not have version information? > > > > Best regards > Kotrappa. > > > > > From: Matt Germonprez [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2014 6:39 PM > To: Gobeille, Robert > Cc: Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing & Hi Tech); > [email protected]; Akanksha Singh (WT01 - Manufacturing & Hi > Tech); Ravishankar T.S (WT01 - Manufacturing & Hi Tech) > Subject: Re: [FOSSology] query regarding fossology+spdx command line > support > > Hi Kotrappa, > > Liang Cao has added an option to generate a full SPDX document in TAG > format from the command line. He has also provided a nice overview of how > to work with the source. > > The source is pushed to here: > > https://github.com/spdx-tools/fossology-spdx/blob/master/src/spdx/ui/spdx_license_once.php > > The documentation is here: > https://github.com/spdx-tools/fossology-spdx/wiki/Fossology-spdx-web-api > > The option for [fullSPDXFlag] is added. > [fullSPDXFlag]: true/false. Only when this option is set to "true", low > definition version of the full SPDX contents are output. Skipping this > option equals setting it to "false." This option should be set to "true" > when you want to generate an SPDX document from the command line. > > You could generate a mypackagename.spdx by running a command like the > following: > wget -qO - --no-check-certificate --post-file=./[mypackagename] > --timeout=0 " > https://domain/?mod=spdx_license_once&noCopyright=false&jsonOutput=false&fullSPDXFlag=true&packageNameInLog=[mypackagename] > < > https://domain/?mod=spdx_license_once&noCopyright=false&jsonOutput=false&fullSPDXFlag=true&packageNameInLog=%5bmypackagename%5d>" > > [mypackagename].spdx > > for example: > > wget -qO - --no-check-certificate --post-file=./time-1.7.tar --timeout=0 " > https://fossologyspdx.ist.unomaha.edu/?mod=spdx_license_once&noCopyright=false&jsonOutput=false&fullSPDXFlag=false&packageNameInLog=time-1.7.tar"; > > time-1.7.tar.spdx > > If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Liang. We are > happy to help. > > Regards, > Matt Germonprez and Liang Cao > > -- > Mutual of Omaha Associate Professor of Information Systems > University of Nebraska at Omaha > Vita<http://myweb.unomaha.edu/~mgermonprez/> > Open Communities Lab<http://ocrl.unomaha.edu/> > NSF Grant on Open Communities<http://1.usa.gov/17mbd1Z> > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Gobeille, Robert <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On Feb 7, 2014, at 4:14 AM, <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > We are using Fossology on a local sever for scanning some of packages for > License/copyright info. > Recently we have installed Fossology+SPDX module on a local PC, and this > gives spdx results as well. > > Spdx.org<http://Spdx.org> gives open source tools to convert .rdf to > .spdx, .spdx to .rdf, .xls to.rdf etc. > Reference http://spdx.org/spdx-tools/tools-from-the-spdx-workgroup > > We would like to know after Fossology+SPDX scans a package and gives > results in sdpx format, > Is there any command line tools to execute on command prompt in Local PC > using localhost server running Fossology agents to get results in spdx > format. > ( Please note I cannot use Web Interface version of > https://fossologyspdx.ist.unomaha.edu/?mod=Default because packages > cannot be uploaded to public) > > I mean, I should be able to get results something like mypackage_name.spdx > or mypackage_name.rdf which complies with SPDX format > specified in spdx.org<http://spdx.org>, which I can use as an input to > spdx open source tools for conversion, comparison etc. > > Hi Kotrappa, > > I'm confused why you mention that you cannot use > fossologyspdx.ist.unomaha.edu<http://fossologyspdx.ist.unomaha.edu> since > you have installed the spdx module on your own local machine. You > shouldn't have to use the unomaha machine since you have it installed > locally. > > Since you have installed the FOSSology+SPDX module on your local PC, then > you can create spdx files (tag files). That option is the default but is > specified in the "Output File Type" pull down on the SPDX Edit screen. So > though we call it a .tag file, I think that is the same as the .spdx file. > > The command line (web api) doc is at: > > https://github.com/spdx-tools/fossology-spdx/wiki/Fossology-SPDX-Web-API > > However, this does not generate the full .spdx (tag) output. > > If I have not understood your question completely, please ask again. > Liang Cao is the author of the SPDX module and he is on this list as well. > > Thanks, > Bob Gobeille > > _______________________________________________ > fossology mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology > > > > > > The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments > to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and > may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are > not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy > this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of > this message and any attachments. > > WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient > should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. > The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus > transmitted by this email. > > www.wipro.com > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.fossology.org/pipermail/fossology/attachments/20140220/d5b54887/attachment.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > fossology mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology > > > End of fossology Digest, Vol 75, Issue 18 > ***************************************** > > > > > > The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments > to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and > may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are > not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy > this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of > this message and any attachments. > > WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient > should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. > The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus > transmitted by this email. > > www.wipro.com >
_______________________________________________ fossology mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
