Die 17. 06. 20 et hora 09:15 Michael C. Jaeger scripsit: > 2. Some metadata about the file: in this case we have picked license > information from SW Heritage's own license scanning. It is redundant, if > you did the fossology scan on your server already. but we felt it could be > extended in future with more metadata once the API is offering this (for > example, we would find inetresting in which project(s) or URL locations the > file was found)
Yes! That sounds exactly what I hoped would turn out :D > Redundant: the SW Heritage license results are processed in the FOSSology as > an agent, so it is similar to having nomos and monk reporting license > findings ... That is what I suspected. One cool option could be, if you were to find a whole package (e.g. JAR) in the source code and FOSSology could match that to a SwHeritage entry, that might get rid of a need of (a major part of) code duplication scanners. > Will have a look at the wiki to clarify it. Thank you, that would be great. cheers, Matija -- gsm: tel:+386.41.849.552 www: https://matija.suklje.name xmpp: matija.suk...@gabbler.org sip: matija_suk...@ippi.fr -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3374): https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/message/3374 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fossology.org/mt/74912707/21656 Group Owner: fossology+ow...@lists.fossology.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.fossology.org/g/fossology/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
