Hoi, As it is it will remain in this way unless On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Michael Everson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On 14 Nov 2008, at 11:30, Gerard Meijssen wrote: > > > Because this is one of the most heavily fought battles that did not > > result in a situation that is acceptable to all. > > Well, since "mo" is now deprecated, re-naming it "ro-Cyrl" can be done > without really taking any decision. It's essentially cosmetic. > > > The issue is that the people behind the mo.wikipedia are not living > > anywhere near the areas involved and they are not native speakers/ > > writers either. It would have been good when this thing had been > > just deleted because the pain would have worn off. However, the > > decision was that when a native speaker comes along, it can be > > restarted... > > I don't understand. Is it to be deleted? Is it to be re-named? If not > the former, then surely the latter. > > Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
